Comments on: News and its journey upwards

By: Rajesh Setty

Rajesh Setty — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:42:44 +0000

That’s a cool story. Thanks for sharing this Mike.

Best,
Rajesh

By: Mike Ramm

Mike Ramm — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:40:24 +0000

We had a great movie in 1960s in Bulgaria. It was called “Whale” and it told a story of a small team of fishermen who succeeded to catch only a small fish for a whole week in the sea. When their way back home, they confessed to their manager on the radio what they caught. Then he decided to enlarge the size of the caught fish and he told his colleagues that it was a bigger fish. Then the information went upper and upper and the fish grew bigger and bigger and finally it was reported to the Party leader (it was during the communist time) that the fishermen had caught a whale.

It was a parody but showed exactly the way information goes up and is distorted.

Thank you, Raj, for bringing this topic. It’s a great food for thought.

By: Rajesh Setty

Rajesh Setty — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:26:20 +0000

Thank you Raj for your comment. How have you been?

I agree that social media within and outside the organizations have made a big impact on the way news travels.

Hopefully more companies will leverage that to the benefit of all

Best,
Rajesh

By: raj

raj — Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:43:12 +0000

Communication, Communication and more communication and more so leveraging social media both within and outside can probably lessen the impact of bad news filtering and shrinking on its way up!

Cheers

By: jorge orta

jorge orta — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:50:42 +0000

i think this is a problem, but soon the ceo will find out how big the problem was, by the time he finds out the company will have worse problems than the first one.

By: Rajesh Setty

Rajesh Setty — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:07:29 +0000

Venkk, thank you for the clarification. Now I understand our perspective.

Best,
Rajesh

By: Venkk Sastry

Venkk Sastry — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:31:12 +0000

Hi Raj,

I apologize and will try again. I am saying how the news travels up words is subjective to the type of news and the person(s) involved in the chain. For example, if a person in lowest level is performing/contributing extremely well it might not travel up at all (or might definitely be morphed). Think of this example in an innovative organizational context — loss is for the organization.

The most important reason for me is people are generally (consciously or subconsciously) marketing to their superiors/juniors while communicating (just their nature). Having understanding of this (and so many other) hidden variables in an organizational structure will enable to create an effective process framework to foster more open communication.

This question may also help:

What are the different factors (variables) that are causing the current breakdown?

regards
venkk

By: Rajesh Setty

Rajesh Setty — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 02:21:14 +0000

Venkk,

Thank you for your comment.

I am sure you have a point there. But I could not understand it. Please pardon me and elaborate. May be it’s the pairings – good/bad, up/down and “who” and “what” all coming together that confused me a bit.

Have a wonderful weekend.

Best,
Raj

By: Venkk Sastry

Venkk Sastry — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:06:15 +0000

Hi Rajesh

I happen to think its more subjective on the actual good/bad news. Good/bad news might get blown up/down depending on “Who?” and “What?”

Have a great weekend.

regards
venkk