How much should you spend to save a dollar?
By Rajesh Setty on Sun 05 Jul 2009, 5:46 PM - 6 Comments
First a quick note and some background information.
Note: I love RedBox and have nothing against them. I think they have a cool service. The example here is only to make a point. For those of you who don’t know about Redbox, you can rent the latest DVDs at the redbox terminal for $1 per night (here, free plug for them)
Personal Background: Before my entrepreneurial journey, I used to work for a CRM company where I implemented large customer support and self-service solutions in US and Europe. So I am very interested in how people handle customer service.
Background: A few weeks ago, I rented a movie from Redbox. That movie didn’t work and I called the customer service. The representative there (Eugene) was very nice and he promised to send a coupon code for a free rental. That was good. Last week when I tried to use it, the code didn’t work. That was bad. So I sent a reply to the customer service expressing my frustration. In a few minutes I got two replies from two different people
Reply #1 (from Diego) – Very Good
Thank you for your e-mail. We apologize for the inconvenience. To replace the invalid promo code, I have issued you a new promo code (below). . The code is good for a free one-night rental of any DVD of your choice. The code is valid for 45 days from today’s date. The code is:
XXXXXXX
Reply #2 (from No Name Customer Service Representative) – Bad
Thank you for your email. When did you try to use the code?
Why is the second reply bad?
There are several reasons:
1. You are trying to save a dollar and spending a few dollars in that process.
2. You are adding insult to injury to the customer. He is already frustrated that your systems are not working and by asking him to explain further you are escalating his frustration.
3. It shows that your systems are not strong enough to identity when this code was used.
4. It shows that the support responses are not coordinated as you are sending mixed messages to the customer.
5. By sending a no name reply, you are removing the human element. Am I talking to a person or a robot?
Every time someone tries to spend fifty bucks to save a dollar, it just baffles me
- Quotes worth recording – Will Rogers
- The return of Simplicity
- Wachovia Advertisement: Want your gas money back?
- Ways to distinguish yourself – #92 Watch with whom you spend most of your time
Posted in the Business Models category.






Ram on July 6th, 2009
I Agree with you on all, though I think the 2nd bullet “… adding insult to injury…” is something to think about. I agree it adds frustration to the customer, and I also agree the 2nd reply appears to be impolite and could have asked differently, however, to the point of asking questions – I think if it is asked in a better way, it is required for customer service to ask questions and undersatnd the situation.
How else would a customer service be able to know what the issue is to provide a better service? If the 2nd CSRep had asked it differently I believe it would have been the following sequence:
1. Apology
2. explain the possibilities of coupon not working for you
3. ask, if any of these? or something else?
4. check if they have a way to track the coupon code usage on their systems
4. provide a replacement code and mention the expiry policy again
5. Apologize again to wrap up
In my opinion, although reply#1 satisfied the customer instantly in one line, but not doing the right thing from the customer service perspective. What if the replacement code didn’t work the customer again? Now, he is not aware of the previous issue either. Would customer be happy this time, he would either (a) pursue again with anger tone adding all his frustrations (b) give up on this and share with the world about the service.
just my opinion – I hope i politely commented here